Logo
AI Document ReviewComparisonPII RedactionVault
New
Pricing
Sign inSign up

Visa Document Consistency Check

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

A U.S. visa petition package, H-1B, L-1, O-1, EB-1, EB-2 NIW, EB-3, F-1, B-1/B-2, combines forms, support letters, evidence exhibits, and beneficiary credentials that must be internally consistent and meet category-specific evidentiary prongs. Justee reviews visa documentation against the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, 8 USC), 8 CFR regulations, the USCIS Policy Manual, and the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual to flag cross-document inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and RFE-trigger patterns before filing.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) defines H-1B specialty occupation as requiring theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge with a bachelor's minimum

Cross-document inconsistency between Form I-129, support letters, and beneficiary CVs is a common cause of USCIS RFEs

O-1 petitions under 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) require evidence under at least three of eight criteria; EB-1A under 8 CFR §204.5(h) requires three of ten

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

U.S. visa documentation operates under a layered legal framework: the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA, codified at 8 USC) sets statutory categories and standards, 8 CFR regulations implement procedural and evidentiary rules, the USCIS Policy Manual provides authoritative interpretation (binding on adjudicators), and the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual governs consular processing. Each category has distinct evidentiary prongs: H-1B specialty occupation under 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge plus a bachelor's degree minimum; O-1 extraordinary ability under 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) requires evidence under at least three of eight criteria; EB-1A under 8 CFR §204.5(h) requires three of ten criteria plus a final-merits determination under the Kazarian two-step analysis (Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)); and EB-2 National Interest Waiver under Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016) requires three prongs (substantial merit and national importance, well-positioned to advance, and balance favoring waiver of labor certification). Cross-document inconsistencies between Form I-129/I-140, support letters, beneficiary CVs, degree evaluations, and Labor Condition Application wage levels are a common cause of USCIS Requests for Evidence, which delay adjudication and, in cap-subject H-1B cases, can put the petition at risk. Justee analyzes visa documentation against this layered framework so applicants, employers, and counsel can identify gaps before USCIS does. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract as a PDF or DOCX file, or paste the text

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Detects mismatches between I-129, support letters, beneficiary CVs, and degree evaluations

Maps evidence to each statutory prong (specialty occupation, extraordinary ability, NIW Dhanasar)

Surfaces RFE-trigger patterns USCIS routinely cites (vague duties, generic letters, missing equivalency)

Flags LCA wage levels that may not match Form I-129 duty descriptions

Flags forms, fees, and supporting documents that appear missing or out of date

Common Risks We Identify

Job title mismatch between Form I-129 and support letter triggering specialty-occupation RFE

LCA wage-level too low for the duty complexity described in the I-129

O-1 petition evidence touching only two of the required three §214.2(o)(3) criteria

Degree evaluation missing for foreign credentials, defeating bachelor's-equivalency prong

EB-2 NIW petition failing the Dhanasar prong-three balance-of-equities analysis

Illustrative Example

For example, Justee reviews a Form I-129 H-1B petition package: I-129 listing job title "Software Developer" at Wage Level II, a six-page support letter describing duties consistent with a senior DevOps Engineer (production infrastructure ownership, on-call rotation, cross-team architecture decisions), the beneficiary's CV listing five years as "DevOps Engineer," a degree evaluation issued in 2019, and an LCA filed at OES Wage Level II for SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers) for a growth-stage SaaS company preparing a cap-subject H-1B petition for a senior engineer on F-1 OPT with an Indian B.Tech in Computer Science.

Issue Found: Three cross-document inconsistencies raised the risk of a specialty-occupation RFE under 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): (1) the job title on Form I-129 ("Software Developer") did not match the duties described in the support letter (DevOps Engineer functions including production infrastructure ownership and on-call rotation) or the beneficiary's CV ("DevOps Engineer"); (2) the LCA was filed at Wage Level II for SOC 15-1252 (Software Developers), while the duties in the support letter (independent judgment, architecture authority, on-call production ownership) might fit a different SOC code or a higher wage level; (3) the degree evaluation dated from 2019, which could invite questions on bachelor's equivalency. Together they made the package harder for an adjudicator to follow.

Next step: Justee flagged the cross-document inconsistencies before filing, so the company and its immigration counsel could decide how to align the package: a consistent job title and SOC code, an LCA wage level that fits the duties, a support letter that maps each duty to the §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) criteria, and a current degree evaluation.

Cross-Document Job Title and Duties Mismatch

Problematic Language

"Form I-129, Part 5, Item 2 (Job Title): "Software Developer." LCA: SOC 15-1252 Wage Level II. Support Letter: "Beneficiary will own production infrastructure, lead on-call rotation, and make cross-team architecture decisions across our cloud platform." Beneficiary CV: "DevOps Engineer, 2021-Present.""

What the review points out

The review flags that the job title, SOC code, wage level, support letter, and CV describe different roles. It points out that the duties in the support letter (production infrastructure ownership, on-call rotation, architecture decisions) read more like the "DevOps Engineer" role on the CV than the "Software Developer" title on Form I-129, that the LCA's SOC code and wage level should match the duties actually described, and that the support letter can tie each duty to the 8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) criteria. Which title, SOC code, and wage level fit is a decision for the employer and its immigration counsel.

Why it matters: USCIS adjudicators compare these documents, and mismatches between them are a common basis for specialty-occupation RFEs. A consistent package is easier to follow and leaves fewer open questions.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Official Resources

USCIS Policy Manual

Official USCIS interpretive guidance

8 CFR Immigration Regulations

Federal immigration regulations

DOS Foreign Affairs Manual

State Department consular-processing manual

Related Document Reviews

Employment Contract ReviewAdvisory Fee Agreement ReviewSubcontract Agreement ReviewPharmaceutical Services Agreement Review
Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Visa Documentation Review FAQ

Common triggers include vague duty descriptions, generic support letters, missing degree equivalencies, LCA wage-level misalignment, and cross-document inconsistencies between forms, letters, and CVs. Justee surfaces these patterns pre-filing.

8 CFR §214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge with a U.S. bachelor's degree minimum (or foreign equivalent) in a specific specialty. Justee explains the standard and points to USCIS Policy Manual guidance.

8 CFR §214.2(o)(3) lists eight evidentiary criteria; petitioners must satisfy at least three under USCIS's two-step Kazarian analysis. Justee lists which criteria your evidence appears to address and flags gaps.

Justee explains what the rules require and can flag inconsistencies between a DS-160 draft, support letters, and supporting documents, with reference to the Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual. It does not prepare or file visa forms. Country-specific consular requirements apply, so check your embassy or consulate's instructions.

No. Justee flags inconsistencies and evidence gaps and explains the rules in plain English, so you know what to ask. It gives legal information, not legal advice. For advice on your petition, talk to an immigration lawyer or a DOJ-accredited representative.

Justee covers two legal systems. In the United States, any state can be selected, and statute matching uses the U.S. Code and California codes. Outside the U.S., Justee reviews documents governed by the law of England and Wales. You pick the jurisdictions that apply when you launch the review. Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate legal systems and are not covered yet.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers, such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses, may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 22, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

About

About usContactsBlogAffiliate program

Follow us

LinkedIn
logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.