Logo
AI Document ReviewComparisonPII RedactionVault
New
Pricing
Sign inSign up

Free Investigation Report & Timeline Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

Have your investigation report reviewed by AI before distribution. Justee flags due-process gaps, waiver risk, and fact-versus-conclusion mixing.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

AI flags fact/conclusion mixing that undermines investigator credibility

Detect due-process gaps (missed witnesses, missing notice)

Identify privilege-waiver risks from over-broad distribution

Free review of HR investigations, internal-control reviews, and litigation-prep timelines

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Justee's AI-powered investigation report and timeline review tool analyzes HR investigation reports, internal-control investigations, and litigation-prep chronologies for credibility, due-process compliance, and privilege protection. The tool flags reports that mix witness statements with investigator conclusions, omit material witnesses, lack documentation of notice to the accused, or apply inconsistent credibility standards. Justee also flags captioning, distribution lists, and recipient instructions that may not protect attorney-client and work-product privilege under In re Kellogg Brown & Root. Investigation reports often become the central exhibit in employment, regulatory, or commercial litigation. Common report defects include sweeping factual conclusions stated as fact, witness summaries that paraphrase rather than quote, and distribution to non-privileged HR and management teams that waives privilege over the entire investigation. Reviewing the report before it circulates helps protect its credibility and privilege. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract as a PDF or DOCX file, or paste the text

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Fact vs. conclusion separation

Witness completeness and credibility methodology

Notice-and-opportunity-to-respond documentation

Privilege captioning and distribution control

Timeline accuracy and consistency

Common Risks We Identify

Fact and opinion mixed without attribution

Material witness not interviewed

No documentation of notice to accused

Distribution defeats attorney-client privilege

Timeline events with conflicting dates

Illustrative Example

For example, Justee reviews a 14-page report prepared by HR and circulated to seven senior leaders for a 220-employee SaaS company concluding an internal investigation into a harassment complaint.

Issue Found: The report stated the accused "was not credible" without identifying what statements supported that conclusion. Two material witnesses had not been interviewed, and the report was distributed to leaders not directly involved in the personnel decision, risking privilege waiver.

Next step: Justee flagged these gaps, so the company could separate facts from conclusions, document the specific inconsistencies behind the credibility finding, interview the missing witnesses, and limit distribution on counsel's advice.

Conclusory Credibility Finding

Problematic Language

"The Accused was not credible. We do not believe his denials."

Example wording (illustrative; have a lawyer review before using)

"The Accused's account is undermined by three specific inconsistencies: (1) he initially stated he had not entered the office on January 15 (Interview p.4), but card-key records show entries at 9:14 a.m. and 2:32 p.m. (Exhibit 7); (2) two independent witnesses (Smith and Park) heard the statements he denies making, and their accounts agree on time, location, and substance; (3) his account of the March 3 conversation contradicts his own contemporaneous email of that date (Exhibit 9). On these grounds we find the Complainant's account more credible."

Why it matters: Credibility findings should be supported by specific inconsistencies tied to documentary evidence. "We don't believe him" is not a finding, it is a conclusion that an arbitrator, EEOC investigator, or jury will reject.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Official Resources

EEOC Investigations Guidance

EEOC guidance on workplace investigations

NLRB Investigation Procedures

NLRB investigation procedures

DOJ Compliance Programs

DOJ Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs

Related Document Reviews

Severance Agreement ReviewSettlement Agreement ReviewInternal Memorandum ReviewEmployment Contract Review
Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Investigation Report & Timeline Review FAQ

Yes. Justee flags distribution lists that include non-decisionmakers, missing privilege captions, and patterns that suggest waiver under In re KBR.

Yes. Justee compares dates across witness statements, exhibits, and the narrative and flags inconsistencies that commonly become impeachment material.

Yes, with the same privilege-protective handling. Outside-counsel reports often have stronger privilege protection but the same fact/conclusion discipline issues.

No. Justee evaluates the report as a document; the personnel decision belongs to your management and counsel.

Justee flags references and witness statements that touch protected categories or color-of-law conduct, so counsel can review documentation and posture.

Whichever you select. Justee applies U.S. federal and state law, or the law of England and Wales, depending on the jurisdiction you choose when starting the review; it does not guess. Any U.S. state can be selected. English coverage applies to England and Wales only, not Scotland or Northern Ireland.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers, such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses, may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 22, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

About

About usContactsBlogAffiliate program

Follow us

LinkedIn
logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.