Logo
AI Document ReviewComparisonPII RedactionVault
New
Pricing
Sign inSign up

Free Civil Court Complaint Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

Upload a civil complaint you drafted or were served with. Justee explains it in plain English and flags possible Twombly pleading gaps, jurisdiction issues, and missing elements. Check your court's rules, and talk to a lawyer or your court's self-help center before you file.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

AI checks each claim against Twombly/Iqbal plausibility standard

Identify possible subject-matter and personal-jurisdiction issues

Flag missing elements for negligence, fraud, breach, and statutory claims

Free to start, with flags on allegations that may read as conclusions

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Justee's AI-powered civil complaint review tool analyzes civil complaints for Twombly/Iqbal plausibility, jurisdictional adequacy, claim-element completeness, and Rule 9(b) fraud particularity. The tool maps each cause of action to its required elements, flags conclusory allegations that may fail Iqbal, and checks whether diversity allegations include citizenship of all parties and a non-conclusory amount-in-controversy. Justee flags personal jurisdiction questions under International Shoe and BNSF, venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, and standing under Spokeo. The tool also identifies prayer-for-relief errors such as failing to plead specific damages categories or omitting a jury demand. Complaints initiate litigation and define what relief is available. Common complaint problems include conclusory recitations of legal elements, fraud claims pled in general terms instead of who-said-what-when-where-why, and complaints that fail to allege citizenship sufficient for diversity jurisdiction. Justee explains the complaint and flags issues; it does not confirm that a complaint will survive a motion to dismiss. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract as a PDF or DOCX file, or paste the text

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Twombly/Iqbal plausibility per cause of action

Subject-matter, personal jurisdiction, and venue checks

Element-by-element claim analysis

Rule 9(b) particularity for fraud

Prayer for relief and jury demand check

Common Risks We Identify

Conclusory allegations failing Iqbal

Diversity allegations missing party citizenship

Fraud claim without who/what/when/where/why

Personal-jurisdiction theory left unspecified

No jury demand timely made

Illustrative Example

For example, Justee reviews a 38-paragraph complaint alleging breach, fraud, and unjust enrichment for a Delaware LLC suing a California vendor for breach of contract and fraud in federal court.

Issue Found: The diversity allegations failed to plead the citizenship of the LLC's members (an LLC takes the citizenship of every member). The fraud count alleged "Defendant made false statements" without the who-what-when-where-why required by Rule 9(b). Both were vulnerable to dismissal.

Next step: Justee flagged both defects before any motion to dismiss, so counsel could address each LLC member's citizenship and the missing fraud particulars.

Conclusory Fraud Allegation

Problematic Language

"Defendant fraudulently misrepresented the capabilities of the software, on which Plaintiff relied to its detriment."

What the review points out

The review flags a fraud allegation with no particulars, which Rule 9(b) does not allow. It lists what the allegation is missing: who made the statement, what exactly was said, when and where it was said, why it was false, and how the plaintiff relied on it.

Why it matters: Rule 9(b) requires fraud claims to specify who made the statement, what they said, when, where, why it was false, and what reliance followed. Without those specifics, a fraud claim is vulnerable to dismissal.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Official Resources

FRCP Rule 8, Pleadings

General rules of pleading

FRCP Rule 9, Fraud

Pleading fraud with particularity

28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity

Federal diversity jurisdiction statute

Related Document Reviews

Pleadings ReviewMotion & Court Order ReviewLegal Brief ReviewDemand Letter Review
Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Court Complaint Review FAQ

No. Justee explains the jurisdictional basis a complaint relies on (diversity or federal question) and flags possible gaps. Where to file is a strategic decision best made with a lawyer.

No. Justee reviews and explains; it does not draft pleadings. The output lists claim elements, jurisdictional bases, and risk areas you can raise with a lawyer or your court's self-help center.

Twombly and Iqbal require facts that make a claim plausible, not merely possible. Justee checks each count against the standard and flags allegations that read as conclusions.

Yes. Justee adapts to state pleading standards (notice vs. fact pleading) and flags state-specific elements such as California 17200 standing or Texas TCPA implications.

No. Justee evaluates pleading sufficiency and procedural risk, not factual merits or likely damages. For a view on your case, talk to a lawyer.

Justee supports U.S. law and the law of England and Wales. On the U.S. side, any U.S. state can be selected. On the English side, findings cite English legislation via legislation.gov.uk. Jurisdiction coverage is identical on every plan, including the free trial; plans differ only in how many jurisdictions one document can be checked against at once.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers, such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses, may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 22, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

About

About usContactsBlogAffiliate program

Follow us

LinkedIn
logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.