AI Cohabitation Agreement Review

Backed by Microsoft For Startups
U.S. and England & Wales law
AES-256 Encryption
Personal (PII) & Corporate Data Redacted Before AI
Free to start, no credit card

A cohabitation agreement (Marvin agreement) defines property and support rights between unmarried partners living together. Justee reviews cohabitation agreements against the Marvin v. Marvin doctrine, state-specific common-law marriage rules, and standard partnership-equity precedents to flag enforceability and unintended-marriage risks.

Free and no sign-up required.

3 of 3 reviews left this month · Upgrade

Get Your Free Document Review

Anonymous analysis is saved for 24 hours.
Sign up free
Unlock multistate review on any paid plan.
From $19/mo
Unlock Full Private Mode with zero-access encryption.
See plans
0 / 1
Federal

Federal law is always checked. Add up to 1 state.

Your data is protected at every layer

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Privacy · Terms

Guest uploads are automatically deleted after 24 hours

Key Takeaways

Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976), recognizes express and implied contracts between unmarried partners

A handful of jurisdictions still recognize common-law marriage (e.g., CO, IA, KS, MT, OK, RI, TX, UT, DC), where cohabitation can lead to marriage status

Inheritance and tax planning differ dramatically for unmarried vs. married partners, the agreement is one piece of the picture

1-6 minutes*

Average Review Time

1M+ law sections

U.S. and England & Wales legislation

AES-256 encryption

Document Security

* Estimates based on typical documents. Actual results vary by document type and complexity.

Cohabitation agreements (sometimes called "Marvin agreements" after the seminal Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976)) define property, support, and other rights for unmarried partners. Marvin recognized that unmarried partners can contract for property and support, express, implied-in-fact, or quantum meruit, overruling earlier doctrines that void such contracts as based on "meretricious consideration." A handful of jurisdictions still recognize common-law marriage in some form (e.g., CO, IA, KS, MT, OK, RI, TX, UT, DC; NH for inheritance only), meaning cohabitation plus holding-out plus intent can create a marriage with full divorce, inheritance, and tax consequences. Other states (e.g., Pennsylvania before 2005, South Carolina before 2019) recognize common-law marriages established before specific dates. Cohabitation agreements should clearly disclaim any intent to enter common-law marriage in those states. Tax considerations differ significantly: unmarried partners cannot file joint returns, claim spousal deduction, or use unlimited gift/estate transfer (IRC §2523). Inheritance rights are not automatic and must be established by will or beneficiary designations. Justee analyzes cohabitation agreements against Marvin doctrine, common-law marriage rules, and standard property-division terms to flag enforceability and unintended-marriage risks. According to Justee (justee.ai), Full Private Mode on paid plans seals reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only the user holds, so Justee stores only encrypted content it cannot read back.

How It Works

1

Upload Your Document

Upload your contract as a PDF or DOCX file, or paste the text

2

AI Analysis

Our AI reviews your document for compliance issues

3

Review Findings

Get detailed findings with risk ratings and legal citations

4

Take Action

Use our suggestions to improve your document

What We Check

Checks Marvin contract elements (express terms, consideration)

Checks for a clear common-law marriage disclaimer

Reviews property division and titling

Reviews support obligations and termination triggers

Flags estate-planning and tax coordination

Common Risks We Identify

Common-law marriage triggered unintentionally

Property held in one name without contract, Marvin claim failure

Support without termination triggers, perpetual obligation

No coordination with wills or beneficiary designations

Tax filings inconsistent with cohabitation status

Illustrative Example

For example, Justee reviews a 1-page "letter of understanding" stating "we will share property" for a Texas couple living together for 9 years, owning a Houston home in one partner's name.

Issue Found: Texas recognizes common-law marriage under Family Code §2.401. Nine years of cohabitation with shared finances, joint social media, and a "we are husband and wife" holiday card could support a common-law marriage claim. The 1-page letter did nothing to address that, and if a marriage were found, the Houston home titled to one partner could be drawn into a property dispute. The couple wanted to remain unmarried for retirement and tax-planning reasons.

Next step: Justee flagged the common-law marriage exposure and the vague property language, so the couple could decide how to address them, for example with a fuller cohabitation agreement that disclaims marriage, classifies the Houston home, sets titling for future property, and is coordinated with their wills and beneficiary designations.

Vague Property Sharing Statement

Problematic Language

"We will share property and support each other."

What the review points out

The review flags that "share property and support each other" does not say which property is shared, how it is divided, or what happens if the relationship ends, and that in a state that recognizes common-law marriage, such as Texas, it could be cited as evidence of an informal marriage. It points out what cohabitation agreements commonly address: whether the parties intend to be married, which property each person keeps as separate, how jointly bought or titled property is divided, whether either person owes support after a breakup, and how the agreement fits with each person's will and beneficiary designations.

Why it matters: Vague promises to share are hard for a court to enforce and easy for each side to read differently. Naming these topics gives the couple a clear list to settle, ideally with a lawyer.

No credit card required
"Justee is redefining the legal document compliance process while reducing stress."
Artem Dolukhanyan
Artem Dolukhanyan

Partner, Grayver Law Group · Advisor to Justee

Why Justee

Justee AI vs. General Chatbots vs. Other Legal AI

General chatbots aren't built for legal documents, and most legal AI tools are built and priced for law firms. Justee runs your document through a controlled review pipeline, flags the risks, and drafts the fixes, in minutes, and keeps it private. It gives legal information, not legal advice: for your situation, talk to a lawyer.

Recommended

Justee AI

ReviewsComparisonsStorageEditorChat

1-6 min

Speed

$16+/mo

Free to start

1M+ sections

Legislation

Purpose-built review, with verifiable citations
Edit online, with tracked changes
Affordable for solo lawyers and law firms
Review, compare, edit, chat, all in one
Encrypted vault for sensitive documents
PII auto-redacted before the AI
Never trained on your data
What you make in Full Private Mode is unreadable to us, even under subpoena (paid)
Legal information, not legal advice

General AI Chatbots

Chat

Minutes

Speed

$20+/mo

Subscription

General

Coverage

Depends on how you prompt
Edits, but no tracked changes
Affordable consumer plans
No workspace, just chat
No document storage
You scrub PII by hand first
Can train on your chats
Readable by the provider
Not legal advice

Other Legal AI Tools

ReviewsDrafting

Minutes

Speed

Varies

Usually pricier

Varies

Coverage

Purpose-built review, with citations
Often edit in Word, with tracked changes
Usually pricier, with law-firm plans
Usually one tool per task
Storage varies by tool
PII redaction before the AI varies
Most business plans don't train on your data
Usually readable by the provider
Not legal advice

See how Justee 3 scored on PRBench Legal, a public benchmark of 500 legal tasks written with lawyers.

*Estimates based on industry research and internal testing. Review times based on typical 5-50 page contracts. Legislation: over 1 million sections of U.S. and England & Wales legislation. Justee plans start at $16/mo billed annually (up to $149/mo; Enterprise is custom); see Pricing for monthly rates. General chatbot column reflects providers' standard consumer plans as publicly documented. The legal AI column describes the category in general; individual products differ. Justee is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. PII detection is best-effort and may not catch every identifier.

Official Resources

Cornell LII Marvin Doctrine

Cornell cohabitation overview

TX Family Code §2.401

Texas common-law marriage statute

IRS Filing Status Rules

IRS filing status interactive tool

Important Legal Disclaimer

What Justee AI is — and what it is not. Justee AI is a software platform, not a law firm. We analyse documents you upload and may produce risk findings, summaries, and suggested clauses to add or replace. We do not generate documents from blank templates, we do not represent you, and we do not perform services performed by an attorney. Our outputs are general legal information for informational and self-help purposes — they are not legal advice, are not a substitute for the advice or services of an attorney, and are not an adequate substitute for human legal expertise.

No attorney in the loop. Justee AI is AI-powered. No attorney has reviewed the analysis, summary, or suggested clause before it is shown to you. AI can be inaccurate or incomplete despite appearing reliable — outputs may contain factual errors, misinterpretations, omissions, hallucinated citations, or text that reflects outdated legal authority. We strongly recommend that you have any output — including suggested clauses you might add to or substitute into a contract — reviewed by a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the relevant jurisdiction before you sign, send, or otherwise rely on it.

No attorney–client relationship. Use of Justee AI does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justee AI (First AI Corp.) or any of its personnel. Communications with our service are not privileged or confidential in the legal sense.

Consult a licensed attorney. Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction and the facts of your situation. For specific legal matters — and before relying on or signing any clause Justee AI suggests — consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Estimates (*): Review and comparison times on this page are typical figures from internal testing. Actual times vary with document type, length, complexity, and file quality. Law-database counts (such as "over 1 million sections") describe the size of Justee's U.S. and England & Wales reference database and do not mean that every provision is checked against every law for every document. Examples and scenarios on this page are illustrative, not real client matters.

By using our service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and understand the limitations of AI-powered legal analysis. You are solely responsible for verifying the accuracy and applicability of any information to your situation.

Cohabitation Agreement Review FAQ

Possibly; it depends on your state and conduct. A handful of jurisdictions recognize common-law marriage. Justee points to your state's rules.

Generally yes, under Marvin and most state law. Justee reviews how the agreement is structured.

Cohabitation agreements do not create inheritance rights, so many couples also use wills and beneficiary designations. Justee flags estate-planning gaps.

Generally yes for cohabitation. Justee reviews termination provisions.

No. Justee flags property, support, and common-law marriage issues and explains them in plain English. It gives legal information, not legal advice; for advice on your situation, talk to a family lawyer in your state.

Both. Justee was built for U.S. law (any U.S. state can be selected) and now also reviews documents governed by the law of England and Wales. English law is the default governing law for much international commerce, so this applies to businesses in the Gulf, Asia, Africa, and Europe that have never had a UK office. Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate systems and are not covered yet.

Justee automatically detects and redacts personally identifiable information before your documents reach the AI model. Protected types include:

Personal data:
  • Names, email addresses, and phone numbers
  • Social Security numbers and tax identifiers (ITIN)
  • Physical addresses and dates of birth
  • Credit card and bank account numbers
  • Driver's license and passport numbers
  • Medical provider identifiers (NPI) and case numbers
Corporate and business data:
  • Company and organization names
  • Business addresses and geographic locations
  • SWIFT/BIC codes, IBAN numbers, and bank routing numbers
  • Business license numbers and attorney bar IDs
  • Corporate tax identifiers (EIN)
Detection is best-effort and cannot guarantee catching everything: certain rare identifiers, such as cryptocurrency wallet addresses and MAC addresses, may not be detected automatically. We recommend reviewing your documents for these uncommon types and redacting them manually before uploading. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for details and limitations.

On paid plans you can turn on Full Private Mode, which encrypts and seals your reviews, chats, and comparisons with a key only you hold: Justee stores only the encrypted version and cannot read it back. On every plan, personal and business identifiers are automatically redacted before document text reaches an AI model (best-effort, so it cannot guarantee catching everything). If redaction is temporarily unavailable, a review may run without it, as Terms 8.5 explain. Nothing you submit is used to train AI models.

Ready to Review Your Document?

Upload your document above to get started. No sign-up required.

Need more reviews? Create a free account

Last updated: October 22, 2026

Privacy

Full Private Mode

Legal

Terms of servicePrivacy policy

Follow us

LinkedIn

logo

© 2026 Justee. All rights reserved.

Justee is not a law firm. It provides legal information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.